There is something to say for a caliber that puts the bullet where you want it, you can shoot a bigger gun and not hit the deer where you want it and it will go far farther then a well placed shot from even a 223.
I would say yes and no. If you have a good gun and can hit the deer in the vitals yes. But for a small kid who is not a great shot maybe no. The reason is it's a small round good for coyotes and varmints. I have a big 7.62x54r round also .311 it called. But it can still take a deer. It's up to you if it ethical for me I could shoot a deer with one. Well happy hunting!
I started with a 243,good kids/starter gun IMO!!!!But seen a buck shot squarely in the shoulder and got away......Need more power to penetrate bone........
Your example speaks more about the hunter then the weapon - Why is that person trying to break a shoulder down with a .243? Or perhaps it was a poorly placed shot? Either way, it's the hunter who didn't perform well in that situation, not the weapon. Hit a deer in the vitals with a .243 and it's going down. Know the capabilities of the weapon your using and then stay within them...
Ive seen a .243 put a 170lb 6pt down no problem and the deer was hit square in the shoulder blade. The shoulder bone is thick but i just cant see a 100gr bullet not putting a deer down if its hit in the RIGHT spot in the shoulder.
There is no way i would want a 100 grain bullet hitting the front shoulder muscles of a big buck,and then expect it to drop!!!!
everyone knows a 223 will kill the deer why take the chance with a small caliber. A 22 long rifle will take a deer down too, me personally I would not take the chance of wounding a deer and making it suffer because of my decision to use a 223 everyone eats there own though. i will tell you if every hunter in ny was using a 223 this year there would be more wounded deer then deer taken.not everyone hits a deer right where they are aiming everytime if they do there either lying or very very lucky.