the additional money will stay in the fish and game fund, and with such a budget deficit..i dont really see any other options...its a horrible spot the states in really, trying to attract new hunters and fishers, but you cannot afford to run the Dnr properly.
even with the licsence increase guys..really think how good of a deal it is for the amount you use it, even if fishing licesnses were 40 dollars, what would it cost you for one night out with your wife/gf?? alot more then that....its really not that bad guys...and now with money earned for the fish and game fund being forced to stay there..this will help, we cannot keep being so cheap and expect better services!
the people we should be mad at are the politicians of the late 1990's...you know..the ones who were managing a state surplus of damn near a billion dollars..why werent problems fixed then when we had the money?